Presumption of Guilt for Reputation

Section 24(3) creates a rebuttable presumption that anyone who "earns a reputation publicly for constantly and incessantly publishing false information" is engaged in business misinformation. This reverses the burden of proof, requiring the accused to prove innocence rather than the state proving guilt—violating the presumption of innocence principle. The triggering criteria are dangerously vague: "earn a reputation," "constantly and incessantly," and "affects public interest" lack clear thresholds, creating legal uncertainty. This could capture legitimate journalists whose investigative reporting is disputed, satirists whose work is mischaracterized, or political commentators critical of government. Combined with the 25's broad "public interest" definition and potential license revocation sanctions, this provision creates a severe chilling effect on investigative journalism and political speech.